Showing posts with label unions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unions. Show all posts

Monday, November 12, 2012

Thugs,Bugs and Slugs



Thugs, Bugs and Slugs
Charlie Earl

“We was robbed,” echoed through some halls and chambers where one might find the elite leaders of the GOP. Maybe. So what? Why not? When you’re complicit in expanding the reach and power of government, you inherently raise the stakes. More power, more force and more benefits are intoxicating for the type of people who gravitate to politics. When such glittering goodies are spread on the table, you can expect a mad dash toward the buffet when the dinner bell rings. You, the GOP power structure, helped to load that table with delectable morsels… each of which cost the people money or freedom…or both. So…. Don’t feign outrage when some precincts deliver more votes than their populations for Democrats who wish to control the federal ATM machine.

It is the nature of elites to use any available mechanism to protect their power. Likewise… the “outs” lust to manipulate the levers of coercion to achieve their goals. When the two join together, as in Democrats and unions, the combination is nearly impossible to overcome. The best solution for restraining them is to limit the available power so that it is not so appealing. But no, Republicans, you had to join in the “can you top this” race to the Nanny State without realizing that you were waving a juicy ribeye before the noses of your hungry adversaries. When you give an inch, you will surrender a mile. It’s an old cliché, but it appropriately describes your complicity in the growth of the federal government, and more tragically, your failure to cut it back when you had control of the Capitol and the White House. One of the great fallacies of politics and governing is that massive power is “OK” if the “right people” are in control.

Well, Lambchop, the right people are not always in control, and sometimes the aroma of power corrupts the right people when they acquire the reins of power. Lord Acton’s pithy observation about the corrosive effects of wielding power was on target. Our only defense against a misguided Nanny State is to maintain it in the embryonic state. Any growth beyond that point transforms the government into a tasty morsel of power….ready for the plucking and consuming. In your brain and your heart…. you already know this. So…why am I repeating the obvious?

If you believe that big government is contradictory and counter-productive to individual liberty, then you should never, ever settle for “almost.” A little larger government, a slightly larger budget or another insignificant program erodes your personal liberty, and over time, those elements of government will metastasize until they consume it. We have moved beyond the point of crèmes and potions. It is time for radical surgery. Half measures merely delay the inevitable… the loss of our freedom. With that sober outcome comes the disappearance of prosperity, the loss of hope and the will to achieve. If or when we support or encourage rhetorical or incomplete efforts for freedom, we undermine the real…the authentic. Reality bites and it’s beyond the time to bite back.

Charlie Earl
  


Monday, October 22, 2012

Closed Shop



Closed Shop
Charlie Earl

The income tax is immoral because it involves the government (your master) stealing the product of your labor. Closed union shops are immoral because in some cases they deny you an equal opportunity to trade your labor for wages. The two major political parties are immoral because they collude to deny alternative voices access to the political process in the various states and on the national stage. Liberty is definitive. You either have it, or you do not. Liberty is tempered by responsibility and accountability wherein you cannot suppress or deny someone else’s liberty to advance your own. Therefore, license (unfettered anarchy) cannot be defined as liberty. It is license.

A “closed” shop in any context is a denial of an INDIVIDUAL’S liberty. While it may advance the goals of a defined collective, individual choice is overrun and shattered. There is another type of closed shop that has destructive consequences for our nation. It is the Eastern University Cabal…(EUC) ..pronounced “yuk.” It is a human tendency to associate with others with whom we are most comfortable. We often share similar values and beliefs, so it is logical that government and the east coast power centers are dominated by graduates from Yale, Harvard, Georgetown and other institutions like them. It becomes a “closed shop” of elites many of whom assume they have divine rights to micromanage the lives of their fellow citizens.

The term “closed shop” may not be precise enough to describe the various forms of exclusion in our culture and our nation. “Tribalism” may be a more accurate term although it is weighted by ethnic and racial distinctions that may not be present in the examples I cited above.

Obviously there is some tension between the concept of the closed shop and the freedom of association that is inherent in liberty. The contradiction is solved by citing one word: government. In those instances where government mandates, endorses, subsidizes or encourages barriers to openness and opportunity, the immoral closed shop will exist. If government is not the motivator or enforcer, then the path of exclusive voluntary association has been chosen. While the idea that any group may chose to exclude some while including others may seem distasteful, it is the power and force of government involvement that tips the balance from undesirable to immoral. When one is forced to join or prevented from affiliating with any group because of government action, the concept of free choice is violated. Admittedly … some groups under both public and private auspices require an identifiable level of special knowledge and expertise (e.g. physicians, engineers, attorneys). The criteria for membership to those closed shops should be as simple and basic as possible. Too often government entities have conspired with professional practitioners to construct barriers and hurdles to limit the opportunities for others to “join the club.”

Liberty is often characterized as a lonely pursuit. One person following her or his dreams and ideals without harming others or damaging their property describes the usual concept of personal freedom. It’s more than the lonely traveler blazing a path. It can include working with others or forming voluntary associations to handle difficulties that may face a community. But….true liberty should not and cannot deny others the opportunity to join if they are moral and willing to abide by the rules of the voluntary association (e.g. company workplace rules, Lions Club regs.). On the other hand forcing someone to join or support an association that does not conform to her or his ideals or is viewed as too restrictive is an immoral use of force. Closed shops of any kind that are under the wing of a too-powerful government are wrong.

Charlie Earl