Monday, October 1, 2012

The Big Johnson Effect



The Big Johnson Effect
Charlie Earl

Contrary to your first impression, this is not a summary of my autobiography. This column is totally based on my opinion and my perception. Whatever research or data I’ve used to form my point of view comes from nothing more than anecdotal evidence and my “gut.” Here is my premise: Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson will “steal” as many votes from Barrack Obama in Ohio as he does from Mitt Romney. For those of you whose partisanship outweighs your reason, what I’m saying is that Gary Johnson is an equal-opportunity thief.

The weekend poll results published by the Columbus Dispatch indicate that Obama has a 9-point head-to-head lead in Ohio (51-42).
My sensitive abdominal area informs me that the margin will be much closer in the Buckeye state, and Gary Johnson’s ballot presence will be a significant contributor to the narrower gap. Why? Because not all democrats are stupid. Not all democrats are blood-sucking looters who expect the state (government) to provide their needs and wants. Not all Democrats see that providing cell phones at taxpayer expense for certain classes of voters is a sound fiscal idea. Not all democrats, particularly union members, belong to public employee unions or the UAW. Some traditional democrat voters belong to other unions that reaped no benefits from the massive stimulus spending by the Obama administration. They believe that they were used and abused. They recognize that the growing numbers and power of public employee unions radically undermines our social and fiscal fabric. They cannot vote for a republican without suffering from cognitive dissonance and internal angst. They may choose to not vote at all…… or pull the lever for a third-party candidate.

The hand-wringing hyper-partisan element of the GOP loves to preach that a libertarian candidate ALWAYS hurts the Republicans. Why would they assume that? Is it because Libertarians promote small constitutional government and fiscal sanity? Perhaps. The GOP leaders do so as well, but “everyone” knows they don’t really mean it. It must, therefore, be the firm conviction and dedication to the PRINCIPLES of smaller constitutional government exhibited by Libertarians that gives GOP’ers the willies. Oh yes, there’s that “foreign policy” thing. Why would some voters prefer a non-aggression policy over the macho interventionism of the GOP (and the Democrats as well)? Perhaps because of the numbers of senseless wars and costly interventions, people have surmised that a muscular interventionism doesn’t work whereas a strong and determined defense makes sense. So….do the hyper-partisan GOP apologists prefer constant warfare, or are they fearful that their failing foreign policies will be exposed?

The anecdotal evidence that supports my sense that third-party candidates will hurt Obama as much, or nearly as much, as they do Romney springs from individual who know the political system is broken. They also seem to suspect that both old fossilized political parties (the oligarchy) share the fault. The Republicans and Democrats have shared power for more than 150 years….a century and a half. The burning question of this era is “are you better off than you were 150 years ago?” Certainly we have progressed…technologically, industrially, medically (though we do question some long-term negatives in the pharma front), but are we better off socially? Are we freer or do we have more liberty? Has the massive growth of government at all levels under both parties proven to be a good thing? Or is it an obstacle, an impediment and a foe of our individual sovereignty?

There are life-long democrats who are asking themselves the questions listed above. Maybe not in a literal sense, but they have some visceral unease about the state of our nation, many of our states and most of our cities. They are unhappy with the direction of their own party, and see no viable remedy from the other political monolith. Chicken-Little Republicans should have enough vision to recognize the phenomenon and encourage it instead of attempting to undermine the liberty movement at every turn. Those who consistently fight against liberty are condemned to failure. Either liberty shall prevail, or we shall all become slaves.

Charlie Earl

No comments:

Post a Comment