Showing posts with label GOP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GOP. Show all posts

Friday, April 5, 2013

The Largest Minority



The Largest Minority
Charlie Earl

While the two fossilized old parties are constructing strategies for pursuing the Latino vote, both parties have miserably failed to appeal to the largest minority in the nation and the world. The individual is marginalized and ignored as policy makers and their minions implement grand schemes for targeted demographic groups.


One does not have to be historian to understand that humans have gravitated toward communal living for security and social purposes. On the other hand our written and oral histories are replete with stories of those who disagreed with others and struck out on their own. The group is not the basic element of human life. The individual is. Individuals drift from group to group while seeking communal compatibility. It seems somewhat fruitless therefore for social scientists and the governments who rely on their findings to focus on “groups” when the clusters are in a state of constant flux.

Individuals represent the basic element of any social structure. Any parent can attest to the reality that each of their children is uniquely different….even though they spring from the identical gene pool. Yet… demographers, political parties, bureaucrats and legislators insist on addressing people as groups or clusters while ignoring their individual deviations from the norm of the designated group. In an elemental way this explains why governments must resort to force to assure compliance with dictates for the “common good.” It is the equivalent of government force and social ostracism being used to force square pegs into round holes.

Our individual natures inherently lead to the conclusion that huge communities, cities, states or countries are counter-productive. Individual inspiration and creativity are throttled by the constraints of the system. Individual desires, no matter how lofty, are sacrificed for the mediocre good for all. The larger a society becomes the more necessary it is for force to be used as a means for ensuring order and total compliance. A social structure of “one” is the most free. Those who have voluntarily mated or married realize that forging two “ones” into “one” is an extremely difficult task. To extend the energy for harmony to hundreds or thousands or even millions of individuals suggests that individual identities will be submerged or lost in order to promote the unreal “common good.”

The wisdom of our Framers was their awareness that local smaller units of self governance were most conducive for individual liberty. The Constitution of the United States specifically limits the power of the federal government to trample individual rights in order to give individual states and their local communities the primary task for structuring community mores and rules. As the power and force of government moves further away from individuals, their unique qualities are blurred and the society suffers. The forgotten minority is the largest minority. That minority is YOU.

Charlie Earl

  

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

One Party State



One Party State
Charlie Earl

OK….please explain to me why the cherished “two-party system” is so precious when our money, property and liberty are being consumed by both parties when they are in power? One would think that two parties would mean that there were stark differences between them thus offering the voters clear-cut philosophical options. Instead… we have the “Me party” and the “Me too party.” What a crock. Whatever differences exist are merely matters of degree and nuance. They appear to share the same goals for this great nation, but differ only slightly on the vehicles for achieving them. In a homogeneous society such minor differences would not be all that remarkable, but in the caterwauling cacophony of our nation today, how can we function and prosper with a single-track statist mindset as our sole national vision?

People who adamantly support the purity of the present two-party system are somewhat like those who live in a household with an abusive alcoholic. As the episodes increase in intensity and frequency, the family attempts to accommodate the abuser, forgive the abuser and shield the abuser. As time goes on, however, the compliant victims begin to understand that there are but two sensible responses to an abuser. One must either flee from him or confront her. Any other response merely prolongs the inevitable tragic outcome. So it is with our dominant two parties….their oligarchy has fostered massive abuses on our liberty and our property. In league they have developed a monstrous government apparatus that will collapse of its own weight but only after devouring our wealth and our liberty.

Why is it that after nearly 160 years of the same two-party rule that has led to decay in our federal republic so many voters feel compelled to support the status quo? Perhaps the Soviet Union would still exist if only the Politburo had the wisdom to divide into two nearly identical factions of the Communist Party. The hungry and discontented citizens may have been mollified a few years longer by the false choices presented by their statist leaders. False choices…..ah! there’s the rub. Their rhetorical gamesmanship differs, but the two old parties offer little real choice for voters. Some of you will insist that there is a yawning difference between them because without one party to apply brakes to the other….things could be much worse. So then, I ask why does the defending party that introduces legislation this is a watered-down version of the original to prove that its “compassionate,” “fair,” or any number of bogus reasons for advancing a statist agenda? Either path steals our property and restricts our freedom, so how can one be better than the other in absolute terms? The differences are matters of degrees while the outcomes are similar.

Some think we over simplify when we claim the two old parties are similar. A Thoroughbred is sleek and fast. A Clydesdale is big and strong, but any 3 year old can identify each of them as a “horsey.” The differences are ones of scale and purpose, but they are too similar to be considered different. Knights rode Clydesdales into battle, and Thoroughbred offspring have pulled buggies in Amish country. Two different horses or parties, but in the end…..basically the same. So are our representatives of the two old parties comparable to horses, you may ask? Of course not, or rather not to be confused with the front end of the equines. One final metaphor may illustrate why our two party system is actually two slightly different wings of one party.

If you are familiar with football, you may know that the game is played on a field that is approximately 53 yards wide with out-of-bounds lines indicating the field of play. Running down the field, straddling the center are two series of short lines at one-yard intervals. Those are called “hash lines or hash markers.” When a play ends to the outside of a hash line, the ball is placed on the nearest hash marker for the next play to begin. If a team continually runs or throws to the left despite how the defense reacts, every play during a specific drive or series will begin on the left hash mark. Our national will and our national destiny are resting on the left hash mark. All that is required for changing the position of the hash marks is an alteration of the rules, and the two parties write the rules. Given the history of their compromises and collusion, we may be playing near the out-of-bounds sideline very soon….with little room for maneuvering.

Charlie Earl

Friday, November 9, 2012

New Beginnings



New Beginning
Charlie Earl

It may seem odd to characterize the time following the re-election of an incumbent as a “new beginning,” but I truly believe that we are entering a new era of governance, political participation and attitudes. Shockingly….for many Republicans….Romney garnered ten million (10,000,000) fewer votes than John McCain or Bob Dole. The amazing fact is that he finished as close as he did to the Obama machine (3 million behind). Whereas Obama governed during his first term as one who may stand for re-election, he has no such restriction or brake on him for this term. In addition he has strengthened the Democratic majority in the Senate, thus increasing the likelihood that GOP filibusters will be ineffective.

In 1854 in Ripon, Wisconsin, an event took place that began a major political realignment in the United States. Slavery was the dominant social and political issue of the time, and many Democrats were disturbed by their party’s failure to condemn the evil practice. In fact many of the leaders of the Democrats were pro-slavery advocates. The Whigs, too, had divisions within their ranks along the same lines. Many believed that the Whig Party should be aggressively abolitionist while others urged a more cautious approach particularly regarding the expansion of slavery into western territories. The Whigs split. The Democrats lost a portion of their followers, and the Grand Old Party emerged as the shining beacon of freedom in a chaotic and soon-to-be dangerous America. It was the platform and policies of the Republican Party that motivated southern leaders and legislatures to threaten secession of the GOP prevailed in the 1860 Presidential contest. Lincoln won. War followed. Hundreds of thousands died. Millions were dislodged and damaged. The United States were dramatically altered.

The new GOP was formed a mere 67 years following the ratification of The Constitution of the United States of America. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party have shared national power for 158 years since then (+ 4 more with Obama’s new term). Institutional slavery and its consequences is a basic moral and liberty issue. One cannot be a nation that respects freedom and individual liberty when the law gives some the right to own the persons and the property of others. Liberty is a sham when some people are denied their personhood and reclassified as property. The issue in 1854 was one of universal liberty. The issues in 1860-1861 were more complex, overlaid and interwoven….but the bottom line….for both sides was liberty. Given the nature of the two old parties today, one could assume that liberty or morality, for that matter, are no longer paramount considerations. Power and its exercise are the prime motivators for the Democrats and Republicans of today.

The formation of the GOP was a result of the two dominant parties’ failure to embrace the very essence of individual liberty. The organizers understood that the principles and foundations of our late-Eighteenth Century beginning had been corrupted. A mere six and one-half decades passed before people of conscience and commitment decided that the duopoly was inadequate for a nation dedicated to the concept of freedom. The mid-Nineteenth Century in America was bloody and divisive, and it was fueled by passion and fervor. Now….today…..a century and a half later….for some inexplicable reason we fail to do what our conscientious forbears have done. We are too timid to dismantle the status quo. We mock and dismiss those who point out the flaws of the system. Why is it so many of us lack the courage…. or the conviction (the biblical sense) to turn away from an archaic apparatus that demeans all of the principles our Founders and our Restorers held so dear?

People who exhibit some measure of self respect and who have a passion for freedom must note that neither of today’s old parties embraces liberty. Each of them in their own perverted way supports bigger, more oppressive government. Each of them has formed powerful coalitions with special interests that run roughshod over the will of the people. Each of them has turned a deaf ear to the “little people” of the land in their never ending quests for the new demographics. Each of them has outlived its usefulness, and each of us should resolve to end their manipulation of our lives. The time has arrived for a new beginning because we are facing a tragic end.

Charlie Earl