Showing posts with label Gary Johnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gary Johnson. Show all posts

Friday, October 12, 2012

Independents Should Vote for Gary Johnson



Independents Should Vote for Gary Johnson
Charlie Earl

You think of yourselves as iconoclastic free-thinkers….unmoved by conventional political arguments. Their bombast and baloney repels you as you sit above it all weighing each decision carefully. Your self- image does not match the view that the two old parties (the duopoly) has of you. They often characterize you as representing one of four basic types. According to the duopolists’ meme, many of you simply are “indecisive.” You are not the ones to call in an emergency. Another portion of you could be described as “loners.” You do not fit in with any creed, any principle or any group. A third category of independent is the “contrarian (my favorite).” You seemingly enjoy swimming against the tide of public opinion. Finally, many independents are viewed as “uninformed” by the duopoly power structure. Rephrased….they think you’re stupid and clueless (otherwise known as the swing voter).

Personally…I think you are wise in a sneaky sort of way. Independents are not deluded by tons of unwanted mail that urges the “base” to vote… early and often. I know that I haven’t been a registered Republican for more than 7 years yet I get daily mailings from the Romney campaign and semi-weekly ones from the Mandel machine. So… you have already realized an enormous benefit from your fence-straddling position. It is, however, less than a month until the final voting day for the 2012 election, and I urge you to seriously consider Gary Johnson, Libertarian, for a number of reasons.

Numero uno (bi-lingual communication): Gary Johnson is the ideal standard bearer for the indecisive person. Many who have difficulty making choices do so because they fear making the wrong decision. A free-wheeling libertarian involvement will not force you into bad commitments like most statist governing does. Shoot…under Libertarian leadership you don’t have to choose at all…ever. Government won’t bother you.

Second: A Libertarian administration would be nirvana for recluses and loners. No Nanny State or Big Brother will hover around annoying the crap out of you. You will not be shamed because you do not support some meglomaniac’s schemes and dreams. You can enjoy your own ideals in solitude.

The third group, the contrarians, should vote for Johnson just because he isn’t one of those other guys. He’s not a guilty member of the ruling duopoly. He’s not “the next in line” to represent a political dynasty. He is not a member of the Harvard-Yale-Georgetown incestuous cabal that pulls the levers of government. He is anti-candidate for people whose voices have been muted. They say he can’t win, and that makes him perfect contrarian candidate.

Because Governor Johnson’s name will be on 48 statewide ballots (Michigan and Oklahoma are still in play), he is a superb choice for the uninformed independent voter. Well…for at least one-third of them as they go through the “eenie, meenie, minee, mo” process of selecting the grand poobah of the free world. The fact that he appears on a minimum of 96% of the ballots in the nation suggests that he has nearly as good a chance of capturing a significant portion of the clueless vote as do the other two major-party/ruling-elite candidates. So…clearly the out-of-touch individual now has more real choices and can assert her/her preference….whatever the reason.

The ultimate independent voter is really a closet Libertarian….but is too uninformed to realize it. Where else could an indecisive, contrarian loner be happier? Gary Johnson is the obvious choice for those who are not constrained by the shackles of partisanship and mass media hype. He’s also a damned good choice for those who prefer thinking about the good of the nation rather than merely postponing or hastening our inevitable collapse.

Charlie Earl

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Democrats Should Vote for Gary Johnson



Democrats Should Vote for Gary Johnson
Charlie Earl

On Monday I poked a stick into the hive of Republican complacency and received a buzzing frenzy of feedback. Because I am an equal-opportunity offender, I now direct my pleas to the one or two sensible democrats who are aghast at what their party and their president have done to our country. I’ve met many of you during the past few years, and a number of you are dedicated union members who are disgusted with your unions’ promotions of the global socialist agenda. You work hard, you hunt, you fish, you attend little league games and you love your communities, your state and your country. You grieve (though more silently) with the rest us about what our nation has become. You recognize that the United States of America has morphed into a shooting star of liberty and opportunity….once glittering and bright….but falling fast.

Those of you whose ties to the Democratic Party run deep and back for generations must be feeling the anguish and the pain of a nation gone sour directed by a party gone rogue. Your party no longer represents the essence of American values. It has become a caricature of its former self….spreading platitudes, socialist propaganda and undermining the social fabric, liberty and self-reliance of America. It has become a negative force on the political landscape. In place of rugged individualism and personal freedom, your party has chosen to advance collective “goods” and societal destruction. People and agendas matter….YOU as a person, an individual, do not. Your party has become so obsessed with the “greater good,” that everyone suffers. Your party appears to have embraced “the lowest common denominator” as its standard for achievement.

If you are earning your own way and doing whatever it takes to protect your family, you cannot be pleased with your party’s insistence that you do more so that freeloaders can get a pass. Charity is good, and so is equity of opportunity and choices, but enslaving some to carry the load for others is neither charitable nor equitable. You may have noticed that your leaders who lead the charge….whether union officials or party bigwigs…. live in luxury while demanding that the rest of us “sacrifice” more so that they can buy votes with your hard-earned wages.

Perhaps you are becoming increasingly uneasy with your party’s insistence that the routine murder of innocent babies be treated cavalierly. You may be a pro-life Democrat, but you would feel much better if the tragedy of abortion were treated more seriously and less joyfully. As a long-time democrat, you are probably somewhat uneasy with your party and its leaders’ cozy relationships with so many huge corporate interests. Perhaps you are becoming weary of the “do as I say, not as I do” positions of so many who hold influence within the party structure.

Ms./Mr. Democrat, your discontent and easiness has become palpable, but you believe in citizenship and civic responsibility. A lifetime of observing Republican hypocrisy makes it almost impossible for you to “jump the fence,” but staying within a party that no longer values you is difficult. Consider voting for a principled philosophy that cherishes individual liberty above partisan gains. Vote for Gary Johnson…the Libertarian candidate for President. In fact…if the hysterical ones are to be believed, every vote cast by a Democrat for Johnson….steals one from Romney. You can enjoy a double whammy by voting for liberty and screwing the Republicans. What a deal!!!

Bottom line: A vote for personal liberty and opportunity is always a good thing. Think about it.

Charlie Earl

Monday, October 8, 2012

Ohio Republicans Should Vote for Gary Johnson



Ohio Republicans Should Vote for Johnson
Charlie Earl

The following headline introduced a story on Newsmax.com on Friday October 5th.

GOP Sees Path to Romney Victory Without Ohio
Thursday, 04 Oct 2012 02:52 PM
By Dan Weil

If the headline is true, and the GOP and the Romney campaign team are calculating a victory sans Ohio, then the implication is that they cede the state to Obama. Dedicated Republicans, liberty lovers and GOP Kool-Aid drinkers should take note and pursue a strategy that moves the cause of liberty forward while simultaneously sticking the shiv into the Obama campaign. Vote for liberty while confounding the leftists and statists.

Another benefit for Republican support of Gary Johnson is that it will discredit the establishment GOP power structure in Ohio. These are the RINO’s who have systematically and consistently thwarted Tea Party and liberty efforts to promote and elect constitutional candidates. Those of us who value liberty and constitutional governance more than simple political expediency have tolerated the “lesser of two evils” theme for decades. Now…we should turn the tables on those who claim to cherish the Constitution and freedom. If Romney and the GOP Establishment have indeed given up on Ohio, wouldn’t a migration to a constitutional third-party candidate make sense? You could join those disaffected Democrats who seek an alternative to their Marxist wonder boy, but cannot completely cross the line to vote for an apparent losing (in the state) Republican. It’s a win-win-win…. For constitutional republicans, discouraged democrats and liberty-loving libertarians….oh yes, another win for our state and our nation as the demand for smaller responsible government echoes across the land.

Some newer polls that were released on Sunday suggest that Romney may have a slight lead in Ohio. If true and verifiable, the Romney campaign crew will probably dump huge resources into the Buckeye state to solidify the “lean.” If this scenario should develop, then you should vote for the liberty candidate because the GOP won’t need you. Either way….your most reasonable option, and the best alternative for defeating leftists and RINO’s is to vote for liberty. On the other hand, if you truly enjoy the taste of Kool-Aid, then continue to support the same inexorable slide into socialism that has served us so poorly for the past century. Socialism is not a matter of degree. It is an absolute as government controls the people and the means of production. Whether one reaches socialist nirvana via the fast track or the incremental one is meaningless. The end result….the bottom line….the final outcome is the same. To prefer the slower route is an amazingly selfish point-of-view because you are enjoy a little bit of our remaining liberty so that your children and grandchildren can be enslaved. Delaying the inevitable always leads to the inevitable. The only variable is the length of the delay.

Charlie Earl





Monday, October 1, 2012

The Big Johnson Effect



The Big Johnson Effect
Charlie Earl

Contrary to your first impression, this is not a summary of my autobiography. This column is totally based on my opinion and my perception. Whatever research or data I’ve used to form my point of view comes from nothing more than anecdotal evidence and my “gut.” Here is my premise: Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson will “steal” as many votes from Barrack Obama in Ohio as he does from Mitt Romney. For those of you whose partisanship outweighs your reason, what I’m saying is that Gary Johnson is an equal-opportunity thief.

The weekend poll results published by the Columbus Dispatch indicate that Obama has a 9-point head-to-head lead in Ohio (51-42).
My sensitive abdominal area informs me that the margin will be much closer in the Buckeye state, and Gary Johnson’s ballot presence will be a significant contributor to the narrower gap. Why? Because not all democrats are stupid. Not all democrats are blood-sucking looters who expect the state (government) to provide their needs and wants. Not all Democrats see that providing cell phones at taxpayer expense for certain classes of voters is a sound fiscal idea. Not all democrats, particularly union members, belong to public employee unions or the UAW. Some traditional democrat voters belong to other unions that reaped no benefits from the massive stimulus spending by the Obama administration. They believe that they were used and abused. They recognize that the growing numbers and power of public employee unions radically undermines our social and fiscal fabric. They cannot vote for a republican without suffering from cognitive dissonance and internal angst. They may choose to not vote at all…… or pull the lever for a third-party candidate.

The hand-wringing hyper-partisan element of the GOP loves to preach that a libertarian candidate ALWAYS hurts the Republicans. Why would they assume that? Is it because Libertarians promote small constitutional government and fiscal sanity? Perhaps. The GOP leaders do so as well, but “everyone” knows they don’t really mean it. It must, therefore, be the firm conviction and dedication to the PRINCIPLES of smaller constitutional government exhibited by Libertarians that gives GOP’ers the willies. Oh yes, there’s that “foreign policy” thing. Why would some voters prefer a non-aggression policy over the macho interventionism of the GOP (and the Democrats as well)? Perhaps because of the numbers of senseless wars and costly interventions, people have surmised that a muscular interventionism doesn’t work whereas a strong and determined defense makes sense. So….do the hyper-partisan GOP apologists prefer constant warfare, or are they fearful that their failing foreign policies will be exposed?

The anecdotal evidence that supports my sense that third-party candidates will hurt Obama as much, or nearly as much, as they do Romney springs from individual who know the political system is broken. They also seem to suspect that both old fossilized political parties (the oligarchy) share the fault. The Republicans and Democrats have shared power for more than 150 years….a century and a half. The burning question of this era is “are you better off than you were 150 years ago?” Certainly we have progressed…technologically, industrially, medically (though we do question some long-term negatives in the pharma front), but are we better off socially? Are we freer or do we have more liberty? Has the massive growth of government at all levels under both parties proven to be a good thing? Or is it an obstacle, an impediment and a foe of our individual sovereignty?

There are life-long democrats who are asking themselves the questions listed above. Maybe not in a literal sense, but they have some visceral unease about the state of our nation, many of our states and most of our cities. They are unhappy with the direction of their own party, and see no viable remedy from the other political monolith. Chicken-Little Republicans should have enough vision to recognize the phenomenon and encourage it instead of attempting to undermine the liberty movement at every turn. Those who consistently fight against liberty are condemned to failure. Either liberty shall prevail, or we shall all become slaves.

Charlie Earl