Showing posts with label Founders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Founders. Show all posts

Friday, November 9, 2012

New Beginnings



New Beginning
Charlie Earl

It may seem odd to characterize the time following the re-election of an incumbent as a “new beginning,” but I truly believe that we are entering a new era of governance, political participation and attitudes. Shockingly….for many Republicans….Romney garnered ten million (10,000,000) fewer votes than John McCain or Bob Dole. The amazing fact is that he finished as close as he did to the Obama machine (3 million behind). Whereas Obama governed during his first term as one who may stand for re-election, he has no such restriction or brake on him for this term. In addition he has strengthened the Democratic majority in the Senate, thus increasing the likelihood that GOP filibusters will be ineffective.

In 1854 in Ripon, Wisconsin, an event took place that began a major political realignment in the United States. Slavery was the dominant social and political issue of the time, and many Democrats were disturbed by their party’s failure to condemn the evil practice. In fact many of the leaders of the Democrats were pro-slavery advocates. The Whigs, too, had divisions within their ranks along the same lines. Many believed that the Whig Party should be aggressively abolitionist while others urged a more cautious approach particularly regarding the expansion of slavery into western territories. The Whigs split. The Democrats lost a portion of their followers, and the Grand Old Party emerged as the shining beacon of freedom in a chaotic and soon-to-be dangerous America. It was the platform and policies of the Republican Party that motivated southern leaders and legislatures to threaten secession of the GOP prevailed in the 1860 Presidential contest. Lincoln won. War followed. Hundreds of thousands died. Millions were dislodged and damaged. The United States were dramatically altered.

The new GOP was formed a mere 67 years following the ratification of The Constitution of the United States of America. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party have shared national power for 158 years since then (+ 4 more with Obama’s new term). Institutional slavery and its consequences is a basic moral and liberty issue. One cannot be a nation that respects freedom and individual liberty when the law gives some the right to own the persons and the property of others. Liberty is a sham when some people are denied their personhood and reclassified as property. The issue in 1854 was one of universal liberty. The issues in 1860-1861 were more complex, overlaid and interwoven….but the bottom line….for both sides was liberty. Given the nature of the two old parties today, one could assume that liberty or morality, for that matter, are no longer paramount considerations. Power and its exercise are the prime motivators for the Democrats and Republicans of today.

The formation of the GOP was a result of the two dominant parties’ failure to embrace the very essence of individual liberty. The organizers understood that the principles and foundations of our late-Eighteenth Century beginning had been corrupted. A mere six and one-half decades passed before people of conscience and commitment decided that the duopoly was inadequate for a nation dedicated to the concept of freedom. The mid-Nineteenth Century in America was bloody and divisive, and it was fueled by passion and fervor. Now….today…..a century and a half later….for some inexplicable reason we fail to do what our conscientious forbears have done. We are too timid to dismantle the status quo. We mock and dismiss those who point out the flaws of the system. Why is it so many of us lack the courage…. or the conviction (the biblical sense) to turn away from an archaic apparatus that demeans all of the principles our Founders and our Restorers held so dear?

People who exhibit some measure of self respect and who have a passion for freedom must note that neither of today’s old parties embraces liberty. Each of them in their own perverted way supports bigger, more oppressive government. Each of them has formed powerful coalitions with special interests that run roughshod over the will of the people. Each of them has turned a deaf ear to the “little people” of the land in their never ending quests for the new demographics. Each of them has outlived its usefulness, and each of us should resolve to end their manipulation of our lives. The time has arrived for a new beginning because we are facing a tragic end.

Charlie Earl

Friday, October 26, 2012

Final Lap



Final Lap
Charlie Earl

Roughly ten days remain in the 2012 election cycle. The campaigning and positioning have been front and center for more than a year. From the White House to the state house to the courthouse candidates have been swarming around their districts and the nation attempting to win your trust and your vote. You certainly can be excused if you find the cacophony of political slogans confusing and overwhelming. Some might characterize it as “white noise”….the irritating pattern you see when there is no signal on your TV set. I suspect the noise factor is the reason that roughly 20% of the nation pays attention to presidential debates. The answers and responses are from one to two minutes in length and offer more insight than a carefully crafted 30-second commercial. In addition…body language, word choice and temperament can be indicators for determining a candidate’s true positions.

Then again, perhaps not. As Rush Limbaugh occasionally says, “Politics is theater for ugly people.” That may have been a truism before the advent of television, but now candidates must be passably attractive. So what we are left with in this modern hi-tech age are shallow beautiful people who have no need or desire to be openly candid with the voters. It’s no wonder that so many of our current public servants lack substance yet we continue to return them to office. Our 21st Century candidates are too pretty and often too shallow. Our hi-tech microwave culture has transformed us into a nation of impatient people who want quick answers and instant resolutions for our problems…. No matter how complex or petty.

The 1858 debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were held in seven different venues across Illinois. Each confrontation was scheduled for three hours and covered one topic… slavery… in each and every case. Lincoln was gangly and homely with a high-pitched voice. Douglas was short and somewhat rotund. Neither was a pretty boy. Contrast their contests with our present-day versions. Each candidate gets a maximum of 2 minutes with a 1 minute rebuttal FOR EACH TOPIC OR ISSUE. It is no wonder that our current politicians lack depth, and our voters remain ignorant about their positions, philosophies and principles.

Our slide into big government socialism began long before the “idiot box” dominated our family rooms. However television, in my view, has been a major contributor toward our dwindling attention spans and massive chasms of ignorance. The slow march toward collectivism has been aided and abetted by our rapid decline in patience and reason. The march toward tyranny has accelerated to the point that it has become a gallop, and we have surrendered our tools for stopping it. This column is a “blog”…. an abbreviated form of discourse that is disguised as being thoughtful and somewhat comprehensive. It is but a “postem note” of rational thinking and argument.

Many of you may disagree with what I’ve presented so far even though if I had used a longer form with proper attributions and underlying research, you may have accepted my premise…. or at the least… given it serious consideration. Others of you are nodding agreeably with my shallowly-given points even when I have no supporting data aside from intuitive observation. I don’t fault you, nor do I masochistically beat up on myself. It is what it is. We have become who we are. If we are to restore our Republic to its Founding Principles, we must recapture the depth of knowledge and reservoir of reason that our Framers exhibited. As we enter the final lap of the 2012 race, let us pledge to continue the trek beyond the “winner’s circle.” If we do not, the victory will be a pyrrhic one. May God truly bless you as you ponder the decisions you must make in the coming week.

Charlie Earl
  


Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Bike Paths are Immoral and Illustrative



Bikepaths are Immoral and Illustrative
Charlie Earl

You won’t see me dressed in a gaudy form-fitting Speedo outfit wearing an aerodynamic helmet while riding my $600 hi-tech bicycle. No, I’ll be the one on the John Deere Gator moving mulch and hauling rocks. As a fierce defender of individual liberty, I prefer the exhaust fumes of expended fossil fuels over the pristine sights surrounding a taxpayer-funded bicycle path. It does not make sense for me that local governments expend funds for asphalt freeways for two-wheeled vehicles when our bridges are crumbling and roadways are treacherous. What about the Marxist mantra of advancing the greater good? Do not more people drive automobiles than those who pedal furiously around our locales?

Seriously….I have no issues with adults dressing oddly and pedaling their butts around our communities while exhibiting airs of physical and moral superiority. I simply do not want to pay for it. Come on, super cyclists , reach into your fashionable fanny packs, grab a few greens and reimburse some enterprising entrepreneur for allowing you to pedal profusely on his/her personal property. But…but….Charlie, you might whine….”what about all the softball fields and other recreational opportunities that government underwrites?” You have a good point, Bicycle Boy. Same deal. If you build it, they will come. Let the private sector build, maintain and operate the fields. The teams and players can access them for a fee (as an aside to anyone thinking of building a softball complex: collect the fees BEFORE someone goes on a beer run). From a self-serving perspective…. My recreational pursuits (or my physical fitness regime) are not subsidized by government, and I resent my having to underwrite them for others. But Charlie…. “If we build the bike pathways, the riders will not be on the roads and highways interfering with other traffic.” Really? Have you driven lately? They’re everywhere…..and they are the epitome of the progressive mindset. Maybe I should call it the regressive mindset.

Because I reside between Dayton, Ohio, and Dearborn, Michigan, I am aware that Henry Ford and the Wright Brothers utilized bicycles as major components of their respective inventions. Here we are after more than a century of technological progress favoring the primitive mode of transport while the more advanced derivatives are suffering from major structural deficiencies. At the same time…those of us who are returning to the land to achieve some level of self-sufficiency are ridiculed and placed on various government “watch lists.” It is absolute nonsense. Up is down and down is up.

You may think that given the heat and intensity of current affairs and the election campaign that this column is addressing a rather frivolous matter. That may be true, but tax-payer-supported bike paths are symbolic of how our nation and our governments have drifted (or slid) off the path of fiscal responsibility and constitutional fidelity. Imagine approaching Thomas Jefferson or George Washington and asking for their opinions about the wisdom of government-developed bicycle paths. I suspect that their individual responses would either reflect horror or raucous laughter. Either response would be justifiable and reasonable because those winding strips of asphalt that are beginning to dot our nation are illustrative of how far we have moved from the principles of our Founding. If the liberals/progressives/socialists/Marxists have their way, bicycling may once again become our primary mode of personal transportation…..unless, of course, you are one of the ruling elites. With our liberty intact, we “powered up.” With our freedom slipping away, we may revert to our more primitive past.

Further down the page you will find a message from my brother in liberty and faith, Bob Densic. Please read it and attend if you can.

Charlie Earl


Greetings fellow Patriots,

We are pleased to announce a new educational series from Back To Basics and CedarCreek Church.

One Nation under God?
America’s founders were united by their deeply held spiritual beliefs which impacted the formation of the new nation. The Bible was the source of many of the principles laid out, but today we are no longer taught these truths. Come learn the story.
Starts Thursday, October 11, 2012 at 7:00 pm at Cedar Creek Perrysburg.  Every Thursday for 3 weeks.
We will walk through the placing of the foundation stones of our nation as study in depth,
·         Planting the Seed: The ForeFathers  journey from England to the new land.
·         Securing the Blessings:  The Founding Fathers devise a nation.
·         Remember, Repent and Return: The modern assault on Judeo-Christian principles and the duties of a Free Citizen

Our studies will consist of video from the movie “Monumental”, and the two educational series “The Truth Project” and “The American Heritage Series”.
This will be an interactive course – your comments and thoughts will be encouraged!

We need to know class size so registration is requested (but not required):
To register:
·         Got to www.cedarcreek.tv/get-connected/classes/
·         Click on “Perrysburg”
·         Click on the first class 10/11 @ 7:00 p.m. – One Nation Under God
·         Click on “Register here”
·         You will be asked to create an account – this is an easy step and, NO, they will not sell your information!

I hope to see you all there for this important discussion.

Sincerely,
Bob

Bob Densic
Founder, Back To Basics