Friday, March 29, 2013

Feel-Good Arrogance



Feel-Good Arrogance
Charlie Earl

What is it about those people who insist on telling us how we should live? What drives them to nip and nibble every little aspect of our lives in their misguided efforts to force us to live as they think we must? Their constant nagging and brow-beating is enough to drive a guy to drink, but they preach that consuming copious amounts of alcohol is not good for me. I know that already, but a gradual failure of my liver is preferable to death from grinding my teeth as the mavens of “feel good” pester me. From the time one first becomes aware of one’s self identity, other people feel compelled to dispense lifestyle advice.

Mommies, Daddies, Aunts, Uncles, grandparents and kindly neighbors all chip in to guide and direct the child. (It takes a village, you know). I sometimes wonder how our frontier families managed to get by without other people hovering around them dispensing unending advice and prescriptions. It is a wonder that so many of our forbearers managed to survive without the beneficent hands of Big Brother, Nanny State and the Feel-Good lobby. Even when we turn to our escapist entertainment sources, we cannot escape the “you-ought-to-do-this” crowd. Multiple commercials tell us how to avoid all the physical and emotional tripwires we may encounter as we blindly stumble through life. A potent body spray will insure that we’ll be sexually attractive, and using the proper baking soda-sugar compound of toothpaste will preserve our fragile choppers forever. Being alone is too great a burden to bear so we are told/admonished to join “Hook-up dot com” so that we never have to suffer the consequences of solitude and peace again. It is so true in today’s world that if you’re not in, you’re out of it, and lots of people are willing to tell you how to be “in.”  

The difference between an exile, an outcast, and a recluse is based on who makes the decision to choose isolation. The end result is the same. The person involved is set aside from the community. The primary difference is the outcast is frequently shunned while some do-gooder folks may feverishly attempt to integrate the recluse into the social structure. The passionate communitarians cannot conceive that the self-exiled person prefers that type of life when for most people it is a punishment. It seems that anyone who chooses a lifestyle that does not conform to the feel-good model must be cajoled or coerced into the social mold lest she or he make others feel uneasy. The feel-good, do-good mentality cannot face the possibility that its pattern for living may not be universally accepted. Aberrant behavior is seen as threatening, and the do-gooder cannot understand nor countenance those who resist the “norm.” In addition the do-gooder is incapable of comprehending the recluse’s desire for solitude and suspects it may be indicative of some underlying disorder. The arrogance of the feel-good do-gooder is the actual social disorder because they believe everyone must conform to their view.

Feel-gooders are smiling well-intentioned autocrats. Their innermost desire is to rule, but they lack the cajones to seize power. Instead they seek to wield power through manipulation and guilt. Their constant reminders about what is good for you and me represent hordes of guilt-laden pinpricks to eventually force us to accept their superior wisdom. We are expected to yield and to comply with their remedies for what ails us, what might ail us and what “no way on earth” could affect us, but you should prepare anyway. When a cat gets severely injured, it crawls away to die in peace. The do-good Nanny Staters want us to live forever in despotic agony. The cat has the right idea. To them I plead: Just leave me be. To them I say: I don’t want your help. To them I insist: I will not yield to the force and power of government while making my personal life decisions.

There were probably some bureaucrats in the Soviet Union who believed that a few years in a Siberian gulag would be a good thing for wrong-way thinkers. There were undoubtedly some folks in Salem, Massachusetts who assumed that a good dousing would cleanse the soul of a suspected witch, and there were probably many people during the Middle Ages who knew that a trial by fire would purge a sinful person of all impurity (and earthly life). The progeny of those types are still with us, and they continue to torment us with their solutions for mythical problems. Busy-bodies, bureaucrats and do-good politicians will be the death of us….sooner rather than later.

Charlie Earl
  

No comments:

Post a Comment